Academic Integrity:
The Foundation of Science & Research
Key Values
Honesty
Truthfulness in learning and research. Absence of deceit and fraud.
Trust
An atmosphere of free exchange of ideas, where everyone can rely on others.
Fairness
Objective assessment, equal requirements for all, and lack of bias.
Respect
Recognition of diversity of opinions and respect for intellectual property.
Responsibility
Readiness to be accountable for one's actions and adhere to established rules.
Courage
Bravery to stand up for one's beliefs, even if it is difficult or disadvantageous.
Types of Violations
Academic Plagiarism
Appropriation of others' texts or ideas without proper citation of the author.
Self-plagiarism
Reuse of one's own previously submitted works as new ones.
Fabrication
Inventing data, research results, or facts that did not actually exist.
Falsification
Deliberate alteration or manipulation of real data to obtain a desired result.
Cheating
Use of cheat sheets, phones, or help from others during control assessments.
Bribery
Attempt to obtain a grade by providing undue benefit to the instructor.
Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence
KhIMU is committed to leadership in innovation. This Policy defines the ethical frameworks and precise guidelines for the application of Artificial Intelligence in the educational process and scientific research, ensuring academic excellence and integrity.
Essential Terminology
Guidelines & Rules
Select your role to view specific recommendations
For Students
Permitted
- Ideation: Use AI for brainstorming, identifying research topics, and structuring work plans.
- Editing Assistance: Checking grammar, stylistic improvement, and translation (as an auxiliary tool).
- Visualization: Creating images for presentations (provided that AI generation is explicitly disclosed).
- Self-Assessment: Generating quizzes and questions to test own knowledge before exams.
- Initial Research: As a starting point for familiarizing with a topic (subject to mandatory verification of sources!).
Prohibited
- Academic Plagiarism: Submitting AI-generated text as one's own original work without proper citation.
- Cheating: Using AI during exams, tests, and assessments (unless explicitly authorized by the instructor).
- Patient Confidentiality: Inputting personal patient data, medical histories, or photographs into chat bots (Strict ethical violation!).
- Fabrication: Citing non-existent references or literature "invented" by AI (Hallucinations).
For Academic Staff
Faculty members are entitled and encouraged to integrate AI tools into the educational process:
- Design assignments where AI usage is an integral part of the learning process (e.g., critical analysis of a ChatGPT response).
- Utilize AI for creating educational materials, presentations, and case studies (subject to mandatory review and editing).
- Update assessment methods by focusing on oral defense, critical thinking, and practical skills that are difficult to simulate.
- Employ AI content detection tools when grading assignments (as a supplementary aid, not sole evidence).
For Researchers
- Assistance vs. Authorship: GenAI cannot be listed as a co-author of a scientific publication.
- Declaration: The use of AI for data processing, literature review, or text editing must be clearly stated in the "Methodology" or "Acknowledgments" section.
- Accountability: The author bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the data, even if it was partially processed by AI.
Protocol for Declaring AI Usage
Transparency is key. If Artificial Intelligence tools were employed, please adhere to the following disclosure algorithm:
Specify the Tool
Indicate the full name and version of the model used (e.g., ChatGPT-4o, Midjourney v6, Gemini Pro).
Define the Purpose
Explain the specific application: ideation, translation, text editing, or image generation.
Indicate the Scope
Specify precisely which portion of the work was generated, modified, or refined using AI.
Prompt: "Create a presentation structure on bioethics."
The generated text served as a foundation for planning Chapter 2; however, the final content was written, verified, and refined personally by the author."
Non-Disclosure Liability
The detection of undisclosed AI usage constituting plagiarism entails strict academic liability: course retake or expulsion (pursuant to Clause 5.2 of the Policy).
